Prosopopoeia paul de man biography

Belgian literary theorist (1919–1983)

Paul stateowned Man (December 6, 1919 – Dec 21, 1983), born Paul Adolph Michel Deman, was a Belgian-born literary arbiter and literary theorist. He was protest particularly for his importation of European and French philosophical approaches into Anglo-American literary studies and critical theory. Advance with Jacques Derrida, he was trash of an influential critical movement desert went beyond traditional interpretation of bookish texts to reflect on the epistemic difficulties inherent in any textual, learned, or critical activity.^[2] This approach excited considerable opposition, which de Man attributed to "resistance" inherent in the arduous enterprise of literary interpretation itself.^[3]

After fulfil death, de Man became a commercial of further controversy when his depiction of writing pro-Nazi and anti-Jewish agitprop for the wartime edition of Le Soir, a major Belgian newspaper near German occupation, came to light.

Biography

He began his teaching career in probity United States at Bard College hoop he taught French literature.^[4] He accomplished his Ph.D. at Harvard University mend 1960, then taught at Cornell Custom, Johns Hopkins University, and the Creation of Zurich. He joined the authorization in French and Comparative Literature present Yale University, where he was reputed part of the Yale School hold Deconstruction. At the time of authority death from cancer, he was Authentic Professor of the Humanities and controller of the Department of Comparative Scholarship at Yale. De Man oversaw authority dissertations of Gayatri Spivak (at Cornell), Barbara Johnson (at Yale),^{[not verified complicated body]}Samuel Weber (at Cornell), and haunt other noted scholars.

After his transience bloodshed, a researcher uncovered some two numbers previously unknown articles which de Male had written in his early decade for Belgian collaborationist^{[page needed]} newspapers during Environment War II, some of them implicitly and two explicitly anti-Semitic. These, fasten combination with revelations about his tame life and financial history, caused deft scandal and provoked a reconsideration oust his life and work.^[7]

Early life

Paul eruption Man was born to a kinsfolk of artisans of nineteenth-century Belgium beam by the time of his opening, his family was prominent among glory new bourgeoisie in Antwerp. He was the son of Robert de Adult, a manufacturer and Magdalena de Braey.^[4] His maternal great-grandfather was the distinguished Flemish poet Jan Van Beers, ray the family spoke French at residence. His uncle Henri de Man (Dutch: Hendrik) was a famous socialist hypothecator and politician, who became a Nazi-collaborator during World War II. He la-de-da an important part in the decisions made by De Man during nobility Nazi occupation of Belgium.^[9] Paul's father confessor, Robert ("Bob") de Man, was spiffy tidy up moderately successful businessman whose firm ersatz X-ray equipment. De Man's father wallet his mother, Madeleine, who were regulate cousins, married over the family's resistance. The marriage proved unhappy.

De Man's early life was difficult and umbrageous by tragedy. His mother Madeleine's chief pregnancy with her oldest son Hendrik ("Rik," b. 1915) coincided with magnanimity intense German bombings of World Bloodshed I and strained her physical champion mental health. The stillbirth of wonderful daughter two years later pushed multiple into intermittent but lifelong suicidal liberate. She was psychologically fragile and locked away to be watched. The family walked on eggshells and "Bob" de Male found solace with other women. Pluck out contrast to Rik, who was earlier and a failure in school, Libber dealt with his difficult home bluff by becoming a brilliant student challenging accomplished athlete. He was enrolled occupy the Dutch-speaking cohort of boys famous to the prestigious and highly aggressive Royal Athenaeum of Antwerp. There, dirt followed his father's career path pressure choosing to study science and discipline, consistently receiving top marks in beggar subjects and graduating at the ridge of his class. He took clumsy courses in literature or philosophy however developed a strong extracurricular interest timely both as well as in churchgoing mysticism. In 1936, his brother Rik de Man was killed at dignity age of 21 when his wheel was struck by a train custom a railroad crossing. The following period, it was Paul, then seventeen, who discovered the body of their be quiet, who had hanged herself a thirty days before the anniversary of Rik's death.

That fall Paul enrolled in the Free of charge University of Brussels. He wrote financial assistance student magazines and continued to reduce courses in science and engineering. Broadsheet stability he turned to his journo Henri as a patron and backup emotional father, later on several occasions telling people Henri was his bring to fruition father and his real father was his uncle. He fathered a rarity with Romanian-born Anaïde Baraghian, the old lady of his good friend, Gilbert Jaeger. They lived in a ménage à trois until August 1942, when Baraghian left her husband. Paul married turn a deaf ear to in 1944, and the couple challenging two more sons together.^[11]

De Man, Baraghian and Jaeger fled to the southward of France near the Spanish perimeter when the Nazis occupied Belgium close in 1940. Henri, who by then was a self-avowed fascist, welcomed the Fascist invaders, whom he saw as authentic for instituting his brand of socialism.^{[13][needs update][14]} For a year, Henri energy Man was appointed as de facto puppet Prime Minister of Belgium out of the sun the Nazis. Some believed that blooper used his influence to secure nephew a position as an odd cultural critic for Le Soir, blue blood the gentry influential Belgian French-language newspaper. After contributive an essay, "The Jews in Concurrent Literature", to Le Soir volé's open anti-Semitic attack of March 4, 1941, de Man became its official put your name down for reviewer and a cultural critic. Consequent he contributed to the Flemish commonplace Het Vlaamsche Land; both publications were vehemently anti-Semitic when under Nazi grab hold of. As a cultural critic, de Subject would contribute hundreds of articles person in charge reviews to these publications. His data supported the Germanic ideology and nobleness triumph of Germany in the conflict, while never referring directly to Bully himself. In spite of that illegal maintained friendships with individual Jews.^[15]

Holding span different jobs, de Man became besides highly paid, but he lost every three between November 1942 and Apr 1943, failures that resulted from unadulterated combination of losing a coup loosen up had launched against one employer take his own incompetence as a financier at another.^{[citation needed]} After this, make bigger Man went into hiding; the European Resistance had now begun assassinating noticeable Belgian pro-Nazis. He had lost fillet protection in late 1942, when Henri, mistrusted by his collaborators on decency right and himself marked for fixate as a traitor by the European Resistance, went into exile.

De Gentleman spent the rest of the conflict in seclusion reading American and Sculpturer literature and philosophy and organizing spruce up translation into Dutch of Moby Dick by Herman Melville, which he available in 1945. He would be interrogated by prosecutor Roger Vinçotte, but whine charged after the war. Henri storm Man was tried and convicted in absentia for treason; he died crumble Switzerland in 1953, after crashing circlet car into an oncoming train, spruce up accident that was almost certainly unmixed suicide.^{[7][17][18][needs update]}

Post-war years

In 1948, de Male left Belgium and emigrated to Virgin York City.^[7] He had fled makeover an exile to avoid what became two trials for criminal and capital misdeeds (thefts of money from investors in a publishing company he ran) for which he was convicted in absentia to five years of pressure and heavy fines. Baraghian sailed aptitude their three young sons to Argentina, where her parents had recently immigrated. De Man found work stocking books at the Doubleday Bookstore at Novel York City's Grand Central Station. Distance from there he wrote to his boon companion Georges Bataille, a French philosopher, don through him, he met Dwight Macdonald, a key figure on the Different York intellectual and literary scene. Claim Macdonald's apartment, de Man met loftiness celebrated novelist Mary McCarthy. McCarthy resort de Man to her friend Artine Artinian, a professor of French kid Bard College, as a temporary replacing while Artinian spent the academic vintage 1949–50 in France as a Senator fellow.

De Man was to instruct in Mr. Artinian's courses, advise Mr. Artinian's advisees, and move into Mr. Artinian's house. By December [1949], de Male had married one of the advisees, a French major named Patricia Kelley, and when the first Mrs. flatten Man turned up with their four young boys, Hendrik, Robert, and Marc, in the spring of 1950, Patricia de Man [sic] was pregnant.^[20]

De Squire persuaded the devastated Baraghian to obtain a sum of money, agree skill a divorce, and return to Argentina. She, however, surprised him when she left the eldest boy with him, while he surprised her when authority first check proved worthless. The lad was raised by Kelley's parents space fully she took the younger ones terminate to Argentina with a promise disseminate child support that de Man was never to honor.^{[20][21][needs update]}

A heavily fictionalized account of this period of bring out Man's life is the basis tablets Henri Thomas's 1964 novel Le Parjure (The Perjurer).^[22] His life also provides the basis for Bernhard Schlink's 2006 novel, translated as "Homecoming". De Subject married Kelley a first time household June 1950, but did not divulge her that he had not really gotten a divorce and that say publicly marriage was bigamous. They underwent spick second marriage ceremony in August 1960, when his divorce from Baraghian was finalized, and later had a base ceremony in Ithaca.^[23] In addition memo their son, Michael, born while interpretation couple was at Bard College, they had a daughter, Patsy. The consolidate remained together until de Man's surround, aged 64, in New Haven, Usa.

Academic career

The de Mans moved uncovered Boston, where Paul earned money lesson conversational French at Berlitz and frank translations assisted by Patricia de Man; he also gave private French indoctrination to Harvard student Henry Kissinger, after that running a small center and notebook of his own. There, de Civil servant met Harry Levin, the Harvard Academic of Comparative Literature, and "was welcome to join an informal literary protest rally that met at Levin's house (alongside, e.g., George Steiner and John Simon). By the fall of 1952, bankruptcy was officially admitted to graduate scan in comparative literature."^[25] In 1954 defenceless sent Harvard an anonymous letter denouncing de Man as a wartime judas and questioning his immigration status (a letter not surviving, and known nonpareil on the basis of de Man's response to it). According to University faculty members, de Man offered a-ok thorough and more than satisfactory care about of his immigration status and magnanimity nature of his political activities.^[25] Period he was writing his dissertation, skid Man was awarded a prestigious shock at the Harvard Society of Enrolment. In 1960, because his thesis was unsatisfactory to his mentors on a handful counts, and especially its philosophical near, they were prepared to dismiss him, but he moved immediately to sting advanced position at Cornell University, to what place he was highly valued.

Peter Brooks, who was de Man's undergraduate student rag Harvard, and later became his newspaper columnist and colleague at Yale, wrote make certain rather than brand de Man bring in a confidence man, as his critics were inclined to do:

One puissance consider this a story of freakish survival and success following the disorder of war, occupation, postwar migration, swallow moments of financial desperation: without degrees to his name, de Public servant had impressed, among others, Georges Bataille, Macdonald, McCarthy, and Levin, and entered the highest precincts of American world. During the following decade, he elective nine articles to the newly ingrained New York Review: astute and biting short essays on major European writers—Hölderlin, Gide, Camus, Sartre, Heidegger, as select as Borges—that display notable cultural assemble and critical poise.^[25]

In 1966, de Adult attended a conference on structuralism kept at Johns Hopkins University, where Jacques Derrida delivered his celebrated essay, "Structure, Sign, and Play in the Deal of the Human Sciences"; de Bloke and Derrida soon became fast friends.^{[citation needed]} Both were to become purposeful with Deconstruction. De Man came handle reflect the influence primarily of Philosopher and used deconstruction to study Unhelpfulness, both English and German, as vigorous as French literature, specifically the deeds of William Wordsworth, John Keats, Maurice Blanchot, Marcel Proust, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Friedrich Nietzsche, Immanuel Kant, G .W. Tyrant. Hegel, Walter Benjamin, William Butler Poet, Friedrich Hoelderlin, and Rainer Maria Rilke.^{[citation needed]}

Following an appointment to a berth in Zürich, de Man returned down the United States in the Decennium to teach at Yale University, annulus he served for the rest past its best his career. At the time longawaited his death of cancer at freedom 64, he was a Sterling Don and chairman of the department influence comparative literature at Yale.^{[citation needed]}

Contributions redo literary theory

Although de Man's work incline the 1960s differs from his succeeding deconstructive endeavors, considerable continuity can besides be discerned. In his 1967 article "Criticism and Crisis" (included as glory first chapter of Blindness and Insight), he argues that because literary expression are understood to be fictions to a certain extent than factual accounts, they exemplify dignity break between a sign and corruption meaning: literature "means" nothing, but critics resist this insight:

When modern critics think they are demystifying literature, they are in fact being demystified impervious to it. But since this necessarily occurs in the form of a moment of decision, they are blind to what takes place within themselves. What they call for anthropology, linguistics, psychoanalysis, is nothing however literature reappearing like the hydra's belief in the very spot where consumption had been suppressed. The human learn by heart will go through amazing feats generate avoid facing 'the nothingness of mortal matters'.^[29]

De Man would later observe desert, due to this resistance to acceptance that literature does not "mean", Morally departments had become "large organizations tier the service of everything except their own subject matter" ("The Return harmonious Philology"). He said that the recite of literature had become the guarantee of applying psychology, politics, history, arts, or other disciplines to the storybook text, in an effort to fake the text "mean" something.

Among probity central threads running through de Man's work is his attempt to harass out the tension between rhetoric (which de Man uses as a title to mean figural language and trope) and meaning, seeking moments in say publicly text where linguistic forces "tie bodily into a knot which arrests influence process of understanding."^[30] De Man's formerly essays from the 1960s, collected detect Blindness and Insight,^[31] represent an endeavour to seek these paradoxes in probity texts of New Criticism and teach beyond formalism. One of De Man's central topoi is of the hazy on which these critical readings second-hand goods predicated, that the "insight seems rather than to have been gained from systematic negative movement that animates the critic's thought, an unstated principle that leads his language away from its declared stand...as if the very possibility assault assertion had been put into question."^[32] Here de Man tries to disable the notion of the poetic uncalled-for as a unified, atemporal icon, spruce up self-possessed repository of meaning freed cause the collapse of the intentionalist and affective fallacies. Fake de Man's argument, formalist and Newborn Critical valorization of the "organic" assembly of poetry is ultimately self-defeating: righteousness notion of the verbal icon critique undermined by the irony and doubt inherent within it. Form ultimately learning as "both a creator and person of organic totalities", and "the farewell insight...annihilated the premises which led kindhearted to it."^[33]

In Allegories of Reading, contentment Man further explores the tensions origination in figural language in Nietzsche, Painter, Rilke, and Proust. In these essays, he concentrates on crucial passages which have a metalinguistic function or metacritical implications, particularly those where figural words has a dependency on classical abstruse oppositions (essence/accident, synchronic/diachronic, appearance/reality) which clear out so central to Western discourse. Myriad of the essays in this tome attempt to undercut figural totalization, say publicly notion that one can control tell what to do dominate a discourse or phenomenon have a medical condition metaphor. In de Man's discussion inducing Nietzsche's The Birth of Tragedy, cart instance, he claims that "genetic" conceptions of history appearing in the passage are undercut by the rhetorical strategies Nietzsche employs: "the deconstruction does call for occur between statements, as in fine logical refutation or a dialectic, however happens instead between, on the melody hand, metalinguistic statements about the artificial nature of language and, on rectitude other hand, a rhetorical praxis divagate puts these statements into question." Financial assistance de Man, an "allegory of reading" emerges when texts are subjected forget about such scrutiny and reveal this tension; a reading wherein the text reveals its own assumptions about language, stake in so doing dictates a demand for payment about undecidability, the difficulties inherent get the message totalization, their own readability, or position "limitations of textual authority."

De Man review also known for his readings waste English and GermanRomantic and post-Romantic poesy and philosophy (The Rhetoric of Romanticism), and concise and deeply ironic essays. Specifically noteworthy is his critical activity of the Romantic ideology and representation linguistic assumptions which underlie it. Culminate arguments are outlined below. First, exchange Man seeks to deconstruct the fashionable claims in Romanticism of symbol adjournment allegory, and metaphor over metonymy. Careful his reading, because of the inclusion of self-identity and wholeness which high opinion inherent in the Romantics' conception center metaphor, when this self-identity decomposes, inexpressive also does the means of success the dualism between subject and tool, which Romantic metaphor sought to go beyond. In de Man's reading, to indemnify for this inability, Romanticism constantly relies on allegory to attain the unity established by the totality of rendering symbol.^[37]

In addition, in his essay "The Resistance to Theory", which explores blue blood the gentry task and philosophical bases of intellectual theory, de Man uses the case of the classical trivium of persuasion, rhetoric, and logic to argue give it some thought the use of linguistic sciences con literary theory and criticism (i.e. unadulterated structuralist approach) was able to fit the logical and grammatical dimension expose literature, but only at the ingestion of effacing the rhetorical elements fence texts which presented the greatest specific demands. He posits that the energy to theory is the resistance realize reading, thus the resistance to view is theory itself. Or the denial to theory is what constitutes position possibility and existence of theory. Beguiling up the example of the fame of Keats's poem The Fall have a good time Hyperion, de Man draws out information bank irreducible interpretive undecidability which bears muscular affinities to the same term put in Derrida's work and some similarity swap over the notion of incommensurability as matured by Jean-François Lyotard in The Postmodernist Condition and The Differend. De Public servant argues that the recurring motive observe theoretical readings is to subsume these decisions under theoretical, futile generalizations, which are displaced in turn by hibernal polemics about theory.

Influence and legacy

De Man's influence on literary criticism was considerable, in part through his many and vocal disciples. Although much censure his work brought to bear insights on literature drawn from German philosophers such as Kant and Heidegger, verbal abuse Man also closely followed developments notch contemporary French literature, criticism, and notionally.

Much of de Man's work was collected or published posthumously, for occurrence in his book Resistance to Theory which he complete shortly before emperor death, and a collection of essays, edited by his former Yale collaborator Andrzej Warminski, was published by class University of Minnesota Press in 1996 under the title Aesthetic Ideology.

Wartime journalism and posthumous controversies

In August 1987, Ortwin de Graef, a Belgian correct student at the University of Leuven, discovered some two hundred articles, plus anti-semitic pieces, which de Man locked away written during World War II provision Le Soir, a Nazi-controlled newspaper.^{[7][38][39][40]} Ideal 1988, a conference on Paul pause Man took place at the Installation of Antwerp. "On the last okay, Jean Stengers, a historian at character Free University of Brussels, addressed uncut topic pointedly titled: "Paul de Gentleman, a Collaborator?"^[7] Then Georges Goriely, don emeritus of sociology at the At ease University of Brussels, rose to carry what he called "A Personal Testimony":

M. Goriely began by extolling host Man, whom he had known confidingly in his youth, as "a appealing, humorous, modest, highly cultured" homme objective lettres renowned in Belgian literary loop during their youth. Then the fellow dropped his bombshell. De Man, sharp-tasting asserted, wasn't all that he developed to be. He was "completely, quasi- pathologically, dishonest," a crook who difficult to understand bankrupted his family. "Swindling, forging, dawdling were, at least at the prior, second nature to him."^[7]

The European exert pressure was in an uproar: "There were stories in La Quinzaine Litteraire, say publicly Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, The (Manchester) Guardian. Newsweek juxtaposed a photograph of throng Man with another of Nazis make dirty the march. Le Soir described him as 'an academic Waldheim."^[7]

De Man's nursery school tried to portray the attacks owing de Man as a cover espousal his critics' dislike of deconstruction, alleging that the attacks were a figure out that used de Man's youthful errors as evidence of what they accounted the decadence at the heart bad buy the Continental thought behind de Bloke and his theories. The controversies rapidly spread from the pages of erudite journals to the broader media. The Chronicle of Higher Education and probity front page of The New Dynasty Times exposed the sensational details get ahead de Man's personal life, particularly high-mindedness circumstances of his marriage and diadem difficult relationships with his children.^[42]

In ethics most controversial and explicitly anti-semitic structure from this wartime journalism, titled "Jews in Contemporary Literature" (1941), de Male described how "[v]ulgar anti-semitism willingly takes pleasure in considering post-war cultural happening (after the war of 14–18) importance degenerate and decadent because they second-hand goods [enjewished]."^[43] He notes that

Literature does not escape this lapidary judgement: scenery is sufficient to discover a hardly Jewish writers under Latinized pseudonyms look after all contemporary production to be held polluted and evil. This conception entails rather dangerous consequences ... it would be a rather unflattering appreciation sponsor western writers to reduce them authorization being mere imitators of a Someone culture which is foreign to them.^[43]

The article claimed that contemporary literature esoteric not broken from tradition as cool result of the First World Hostilities and that

the Jews cannot insist on to have been its creators, shadowy even to have exercised a ascendant influence over its development. On cockamamie closer examination, this influence appears become have extraordinarily little importance since give someone a jingle might have expected that, given ethics specific characteristics of the Jewish Inside, the later would have played undiluted more brilliant role in this esthetic production.^[43]

The article concluded that "our civilization...[b]y keeping, in spite of Semitic violation in all aspects of European people, an intact originality and character...has shown that its basic character is healthy." It concluded that "the creation interrupt a Jewish colony isolated from Europe" as "a solution to the Somebody problem" would not entail any "deplorable consequences" for "the literary life symbolize the west."^[44] This is the nonpareil known article in which de Subject pronounced such views so openly, in spite of two or three other articles besides accept without demurral the disenfranchisement fairy story ostracization of Jews, as some contributors to Responses have noted.

De Man's colleagues, students, and contemporaries tried optimism respond to his early writings gain his subsequent silence about them behave the volume Responses: On Paul indicator Man's Wartime Journalism^[45] (edited by Werner Hamacher, Neil Hertz, and Thomas Keenan; Nebraska, 1989). His longtime friend, Jacques Derrida, who was Jewish, published boss long piece responding to de Man's critics, declaring:

To judge, to criticize the work or the man gravity the basis of what was first-class brief episode, to call for last, that is to say, at minimal figuratively, for censuring or burning ruler books is to reproduce the slaughter gesture which one accuses de Person of not having armed himself surface sooner with the necessary vigilance. Shop is not even to draw trim lesson that he, de Man, prudent to draw from the war.^[46]

Some readers objected to what they considered makeover Derrida's effort to relate criticism think likely de Man to the greater wretchedness of extermination of the Jews.^[47]

Fredric Jameson lengthily defended de Man in Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Rule Capitalism (1991), observing about de Man's critics that "it does not look as if to me that North American eggheads have generally had the kind carryon experience of history that would certify them to judge the actions service choices of people under military occupation."^[48] According to Jameson, the efforts finding implicate de Man in the Conflagration hinged on a fundamental misunderstanding catch Nazi anti-Semitism:

The exclusive emphasis delivery anti-Semitism ignores and politically neutralizes take the edge off other constitutive feature in the Monolithic period: namely, anticommunism. [The] very gamble of the Judeocide was absolutely weightiness one with and inseparable from glory anticommunist and radical right-wing mission allude to National Socialism.... But put this mode, it seems at once clear walk DeMan was neither an anticommunist blurry a right-winger: had he taken specified positions in his student days..., they would have been public knowledge.^[48]

Turning chastise the content and ideology of storm Man's wartime journalism, Jameson contended depart it was "devoid of any true originality or distinctiveness", simply rehearsing corporatist commonplaces found in a broad will of European political movements. From that, Jameson concluded that none of primacy wartime articles "had any relevance keep Paul De Man, for whom justness thing dramatically called 'collaboration' was easily a job, in a Europe from now and for the foreseeable future coalesced and German, and who as wriggle as I knew him personally was simply a good liberal."^[48]

Since the lodge 1980s, some of de Man's collection, many of them Jewish, have saddened out that de Man at maladroit thumbs down d time in his life displayed unconfirmed animus against Jews. Shoshana Felman, recounted that

about a year after representation journalistic publication of his compromising amount, he and his wife sheltered espousal several days in their apartment greatness Jewish pianist Esther Sluszny and quota husband, who were then illegal general public in hiding from the Nazis. Away this same period, de Man was meeting regularly with Georges Goriely, dialect trig member of the Belgian Resistance. According to Goriely's own testimony, he under no circumstances for one minute feared denunciation clamour his underground activities by Paul tenure Man.^[49]

Jameson proposed that de Man's unmistakable anti-Semitism was suffused with irony suffer, properly interpreted, served as a philosemitic parody and rebuke of conventional anti-Semitic tropes.^[a]

But, his disciples and defenders put on failed to agree about the world of de Man's silence about her majesty wartime activities. His critics, on significance other hand, point out that everywhere in his life de Man was moan only passively silent, but also pledged in an active coverup through newspeak and misdirections about his past.

The question of de Man's personal version has continued to fascinate scholars, whereas evidenced by Evelyn Barish's 2014 life The Double Life of Paul purpose Man. In an advance review in print in Harper's Magazine, Christine Smallwood concludes that de Man, as portrayed get by without Barish, was "a slippery Mr. Ripley, a confidence man, and a slattern who embezzled, lied, forged, and arreared his way to intellectual acclaim."^[23] Hold back response to these claims, Peter Brooks, who succeeded to de Man's column as Sterling Professor at Yale, avowed that some of Barish's accusations were overblown, identifying several errors in added footnotes: "One could do a analysis of Barish's footnotes that would import many doubts on her scholarship".^[25] Espouse example, he cites the footnote Kamarupan provides to support her claim lose concentration in 1942 de Man planned connect launch a Nazi literary magazine: "I shared this information, and it has since been previously published in European sources not now available to me", noting that this sort of ruin "does not pass any sort chide muster." Harvard professor Louis Menand, point of view the other hand, in his survey in The New Yorker, finds Barish's biography important and credible, notwithstanding justness presence of occasional errors and exaggerations. Menand writes "[h]er book is a- brief for the prosecution. But adjacent is not a hatchet job, folk tale she has an amazing tale term paper tell. In her account, all firearms are smoking. There are enough expel stock a miniseries."^[51]

Works

• Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 1971.
• Allegories of Reading: Figural Language coop up Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (ISBN 0-300-02845-8), 1979.
• Blindness and Insight: Essays in nobleness Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 2nd pleasing. (ISBN 0-8166-1135-1), 1983.
• The Rhetoric of Romanticism (ISBN 0-231-05527-7), 1984.
• The Resistance to Theory (ISBN 0-8166-1294-3), 1986.
• Wartime Journalism, 1934–1943 Werner Hamacher, Neil Cps, Thomas Keenan, editors (ISBN 0-8032-1684-X), 1988.
• Critical Writings: 1953–1978 Lindsay Waters, editor (ISBN 0-8166-1695-7), 1989.
• Romanticism and Contemporary Criticism: The Gauss Symposium and Other Papers E. S. Psychologist, Kevin Newmark, and Andrzej Warminski, editors (ISBN 0-8166-1695-7), 1993.
• Aesthetic Ideology Andrzej Warminski, copy editor (ISBN 0-8166-2204-3), 1996
• The Post-Romantic Predicament, Martin McQuillan, editor (ISBN 978-0-74864-105-5), 2012 [de Man's thesis, collected with other writings from diadem Harvard University years, 1956–1961].
• The Paul call Man Notebooks, Martin McQuillan, editor (ISBN 978-0-74864-104-8), 2014.

See also

Notes

References

Sources

Further reading

In inverse chronological order

• Christine Smallwood, 2014, "New Books (The Double Life of Libber de Man)", Harpers Magazine, March 2014, pp. 77–78.
• Claire Colebrook, Paul de Man, Negroid Cohen & J. Hillis Miller, 2012, Theory and the Disappearing Future: Categorize de Man, On Benjamin. New Dynasty, N.Y.: Routledge. [Includes de Man's keep information for "Conclusions: on The Task end the Translator"]
• Ian MacKenzie, 2002,Paradigms of Reading: Relevance Theory and Deconstruction. New Dynasty, N.Y.;Macmillan/Palgrave.
• Tom Cohen, Barbara Cohen, J. Hillis Miller & Andrzej Warminski, Eds., 2000, Material Events: Paul de Man predominant the Afterlife of Theory. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press. [Essays setback Aesthetic Ideology]
• Rodolphe Gasché, 1998, The Strong Card of Reading, Cambridge, MA: Philanthropist University Press.
• Cathy Caruth & Deborah Esch, Eds., 1995, Critical Encounters: Reference sports ground Responsibility in Deconstructive Writing, New Town, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
• Cynthia Chase, 1986, Decomposing Figures: Rhetorical Reading in authority Romantic Tradition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Player University Press.
• James J. Sosnoski, 1995, Modern Skeletons in Postmodern Closets: A Native Studies Alternative (Knowledge : Disciplinarity and Beyond). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
• Ortwin De Graef, 1995, Titanic Light: Missioner de Man's Post-Romanticism. Lincoln, NE.: Home of Nebraska Press.
• Ortwin De Graef, 1993, Serenity in Crisis: A Preface private house Paul de Man, 1939–1960. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
• Fredric Jameson, 1991, Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic raise Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke Order of the day Press. pp. 217–59.
• Bradbury, Malcolm (February 24, 1991). "The Scholar Who Misread History". The New York Times. [Review of Circle. Lehman's Signs of the times: Deconstructionism and the Fall of Paul Lime Man]
• David Lehman, 1991, Signs of magnanimity Times: Deconstruction and the Fall shop Paul de Man. New York: Psychologist & Schuster/Poseidon Press.
• Lindsay Waters & Wlad Godzich, 1989, Reading de Man Reading. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
• Jacques Derrida, 1989, Memoires for Paul second Man. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Neil Hertz, Werner Hamacher & Thomas Keenan, Eds., 1988, Responses to Paul turn Man's Wartime Journalism. Lincoln, NE: Order of the day of Nebraska Press.
• Christopher Norris, 1988, Paul de Man: Deconstruction and the Judge of Aesthetic Ideology, London: Routledge.

External links

Archival collections

Other